GMAT優(yōu)秀作文備考相關(guān)內(nèi)容

　　The following appeared as part of an article in a popular science magazine.

　　Scientists must typically work 60 to 80 hours a week if they hope to further their careers; consequently, good and affordable allday child care must be made available to both male and female scientists if they are to advance in their fields. Moreover, requirements for career advancement must be made more flexible so that preschool-age children can spend a significant portion of each day with a parent.

　　Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

　　This editorial argues that, since career advancement for scientists typically requires 60 to 80 hours of work per week, affordable all-day child care must be made available to scientists of both genders if they are to advance in their fields. Moreover, the editorial urges that requirements for career advancement be made more flexible to insure that pre-school children can spend a significant amount of time each day with a parent. This argument is problematic in two crucial respects.

　　The major problem with the view expressed in the article is that inconsistent recommendations are endorsed in the argument. On the one hand, scientists are urged to put their children in all-day child-care facilities in order to advance their careers. On the other hand, they are encouraged to spend a significant amount of time each day with their children. Obviously, scientists cannot be expected to adhere to both of these recommendations.

【GMAT優(yōu)秀作文備考相關(guān)內(nèi)容】相關(guān)文章：

GMAT備考優(yōu)秀作文01-28

備考GMAT優(yōu)秀作文01-28

gmat優(yōu)秀作文作文備考07-23

GMAT優(yōu)秀作文備考精選08-05

備考指南GMAT優(yōu)秀作文01-30

GMAT備考優(yōu)秀作文精選01-29

備考資料GMAT優(yōu)秀作文01-29

GMAT優(yōu)秀作文備考資料07-26

GMAT作文優(yōu)秀備考資料07-26