- 相關(guān)推薦
托福TPO17綜合寫(xiě)作范文及材料原文
新托福TPO17綜合寫(xiě)作閱讀材料就鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)的減少列舉出了幾個(gè)原因，聽(tīng)力材料就這些原因一一進(jìn)行了反駁，要求大家根據(jù)材料寫(xiě)一篇作文。下面是小編整理的材料原文和作文范文，歡迎閱讀!
新托福TPO17綜合寫(xiě)作范文：
The reading and listening materials have a conflict of opinions about the birds population in US. The writer believes that it will continue to shrink, which is contradicted by the following lecture.
First, the writer claims that the increasing humans population will lead to the disappearance of birds habitats while the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her, although the urban development is harmful to some types of birds, it provides larger and better protection for other species. For example, the number of some birds like seagulls and pigeons grow in suburbs.
Secondly, the author states that the agricultural activities will have destructive impacts on birds habitats. However, the lecture opposes this claim by saying that the land used for agriculture is decreasing every year. It is because more productive crops have been invented and more crops will be harvested in unit land. Thus there is no need to destroy the wilderness area.
Lastly, the passage argues that the pesticides will contaminate the birds food and water, killing more birds. By contrast, in accordance with the professor, this viewpoint does not hold water. The reason is that much less poisoned/toxic pesticides and the genetically pest-resistant crops are developed, which dont harm birds at all.
新托福TPO17綜合寫(xiě)作閱讀材料：
In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increasing in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States – birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely to continue, with the result that the number of birds in the United States will necessarily decline.
在過(guò)去的一個(gè)世界，人類(lèi)數(shù)量的增加以及隨之而來(lái)的農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)的發(fā)展和殺蟲(chóng)劑的增加使得很多美國(guó)的野生動(dòng)物受到了影響，而這種問(wèn)題在鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)上表現(xiàn)得更為明顯。更加不幸的是，由于人口數(shù)量、農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)和殺蟲(chóng)劑使用的趨勢(shì)不會(huì)改變，美國(guó)的鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)數(shù)量將會(huì)必然地隨之下降。
First, as human populations and settlements continue to expand, birds’ natural habitats will continue to disappear. Forests, wetlands, and grasslands will give way to ever more homes, malls, and offices. As the traditional areas suitable for birds keep decreasing, so will the size of the birds’ populations that depend on those vanishing habitats.
首先，隨著人口數(shù)量和居住面積的不斷擴(kuò)張，鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)天然的棲息地持續(xù)地減少。森林、濕地和草原都變成的住宅、商場(chǎng)和寫(xiě)字樓。隨著那些傳統(tǒng)的適宜鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)棲息的地方持續(xù)減少，失去賴(lài)以生存棲息地的鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)，數(shù)量自然是減少的。
Second, agricultural activities must increase to keep pace with the growing human population. The growth of agriculture will also result in the further destruction of bird habitats as more and more wilderness areas are converted to agricultural use. As a result, bird populations in rural areas will continue to decline.
第二，為了能夠滿(mǎn)足增長(zhǎng)的人口數(shù)量，農(nóng)業(yè)活動(dòng)也必須隨之增加。農(nóng)業(yè)的增加的代價(jià)是進(jìn)一步破壞鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)的棲息地，越來(lái)越多的荒地變成了農(nóng)業(yè)用地。因而，鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)在鄉(xiāng)村的數(shù)量也隨之持續(xù)減少。
Third, as human settlements expand and agriculture increases, the use of chemical pesticides will also increase. Pesticides are poisons designed to kill agricultural and home garden pests, such as insects, but inevitable, pesticides get into the water and into the food chain for birds where they can harm birds. Birds that eat the poisoned insects or drink contaminated water can die as a result, and even if pesticides do not kill birds outright, they can prevent them from reproducing successfully. So, pesticides have significantly contributed to declines in bird population, and because there will continue to be a need to control agricultural pests in the future, this decline will continue.
第三，隨著人類(lèi)居住地的擴(kuò)展和農(nóng)業(yè)的發(fā)展，化學(xué)農(nóng)藥的使用也增加了。農(nóng)藥是用來(lái)殺死諸如昆蟲(chóng)之類(lèi)的生長(zhǎng)在農(nóng)田或者菜園的害蟲(chóng)的有毒物質(zhì)。不可避免的是，這些農(nóng)藥會(huì)進(jìn)入水系和食物鏈，進(jìn)而傷害鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)。鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)會(huì)吃被毒死的昆蟲(chóng)或者喝污染了的水。這樣會(huì)導(dǎo)致鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)的死亡，即便不會(huì)不會(huì)導(dǎo)致鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)的立刻死亡，也會(huì)影響鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)的繁殖。所以，殺蟲(chóng)劑會(huì)對(duì)鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)的數(shù)量有非常嚴(yán)重的影響。同時(shí)，因?yàn)榧幢闶窃趯?lái)，還是需要?dú)⑾x(chóng)劑來(lái)控制農(nóng)業(yè)害蟲(chóng)，所以，鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)數(shù)量減少的趨勢(shì)難以改變。
新托福TPO17綜合寫(xiě)作聽(tīng)力材料：
The passage claims that there will be fewer and fewer birds, but the arguments used to support this claim are unconvincing.
閱讀文章聲稱(chēng)鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)的數(shù)量會(huì)越來(lái)越小，但是所使用的理由都是沒(méi)有說(shuō)服力的。
First, it’s true that urban growth has been bad for some types of birds, but urban development actually provides better and larger habitats for other types. So much so, that city and suburban dwellers often complain about increased bird populations – seagulls at landfills, pigeons on the streets and so on. Even birds like hawks and falcons can now be found in cities, where they prey on the increasing populations of pigeons and rodents. So, it’s not going to be a story of uniform decline of bird populations in the future. Some populations may shrink, but others will grow.
首先，確實(shí)城市的發(fā)展對(duì)于一些鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)是不利的，但是城市的發(fā)展事實(shí)上也為其他的鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)提供了更大更好的棲息地。這樣發(fā)展，城市的居民常常抱怨鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)數(shù)量過(guò)多：堆填區(qū)的海鷗，大街上的鴿子，等等等等。甚至那些不常出現(xiàn)在城市里的鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)，比如鷹類(lèi)也出現(xiàn)在城市，這是因?yàn)樗麄兛梢圆蹲綌?shù)量不斷增加的鴿子和嚙齒類(lèi)動(dòng)物。所以，將來(lái)不會(huì)是所有鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)的數(shù)量都在減少。有一些的數(shù)量在減少，但是其他的在增加。
As for agriculture, it’s true that it too will increase in the future, but not in the way assumed by the reading passage. The truth is, in the United States, less and less land is being used for agriculture every year. Increases in agricultural production have resulted from and will continue to result from the introduction of new, more productive varieties of crops. These new crops produce more food per unit of land, and as a result, there’s no need to destroy wilderness areas.
對(duì)于農(nóng)業(yè)來(lái)說(shuō)，確實(shí)需求會(huì)越來(lái)越大，但是農(nóng)業(yè)的增長(zhǎng)并不是以閱讀所提及的方式實(shí)現(xiàn)的。在美國(guó)，實(shí)際上用在農(nóng)業(yè)領(lǐng)域的土地每年都在減少。農(nóng)產(chǎn)品產(chǎn)量的增加是因?yàn)橐M(jìn)了新的、產(chǎn)量更高的農(nóng)作物品種，而這種趨勢(shì)將會(huì)持續(xù)。這些新的農(nóng)作物有更高的畝產(chǎn)量，因而，就沒(méi)有必要破壞原有荒地用作農(nóng)耕了。
And third, while it’s certainly true that traditional pesticides have been destructive to birds, it’s incorrect to project this history into the future. Now that, people are aware of the possible consequences of traditional pesticides, two changes have occurred. First, new and much less toxic pesticides have been developed, and that’s important. Second, and perhaps more importantly, there is a growing trend to develop more pest resistant crops, crops that are genetically designed to be unattractive to pests. Pest resistant crops greatly reduce the need for chemical pesticides, and best of all, pest resistant crops don’t harm birds at all.
第三，盡管傳統(tǒng)的殺蟲(chóng)劑的確會(huì)給鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)帶來(lái)?yè)p害，但是用過(guò)去推測(cè)未來(lái)的想法是站不住腳的�，F(xiàn)在人們已經(jīng)意識(shí)到了傳統(tǒng)殺蟲(chóng)劑可能帶來(lái)的危害，因而采取了兩個(gè)措施。首先，已經(jīng)研究出了新型的、毒性更小的殺蟲(chóng)劑，這是很重要的一個(gè)改變。而第二點(diǎn)可能是更為重要的，就是現(xiàn)在正在研究能夠抵抗蟲(chóng)害的作物。通過(guò)設(shè)計(jì)，使得農(nóng)作物在基因上具有不吸引害蟲(chóng)的能力�？瓜x(chóng)害作物能夠極大的減少對(duì)化學(xué)殺蟲(chóng)劑的需求。更為重要的是，抗蟲(chóng)害作物對(duì)鳥(niǎo)類(lèi)是完全無(wú)害的。
托福TPO 17綜合寫(xiě)作范文
The passage claims that bird populations will continue to decrease in the United States, while the lecture argues that those supporting arguments are unconvincing.
In the first place, the author asserts that the number of birds will decline because of less natural habitats caused by human settlements. In contrast, the speaker believes that some bird populations will decline but others will grow. Urban development can provide larger and better habitats for some types of birds, such as seagulls and pigeons, so their populations and even the populations of hawks and falcons that prey on pigeons will increase.
Besides, the reading passage states that more agricultural activities will also lead to the decline of bird populations by converting wilderness areas into agricultural use. However, this is contradicted by the listening that wilderness areas will not decline because less land will be needed. The new and more productive crops will improve agricultural production by producing more food per unit of land.
Finally, the writer points out that the use of chemical pesticides will kill birds or prevent their reproduction, thus causing the decline of bird population in the future, while the professor claims that birds will not continue to suffer from pesticides in the future because of two changes. First, less toxic pesticides are developed; second, pest-resistant crops will be developed and will reduce the need for pesticides. Thus, birds will not be harmed.
托福TPO 17獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作范文
The prosperity of mass media today contributes to the prevalence and frequency of advertisements in people’s daily life. Though there is no denying that advertisements present us with a lot of useful information to guide our purchase , advertisements, at the same time, tend to make products seem much better than they really are by emphasizing the good features only and inviting celebrities to help promotion.
To begin with, advertisements make products seem better by only highlighting their merits. Since advertisements are opportunities for companies to introduce their products to the public so as to attract potential customers and stimulate purchase, advertisers will spare no effort to demonstrate how wonderful their products are. Thus, it is natural and quite common for advertisers to underline how fancy their products are, what makes their products superior to others’, and why people need their products. For instance, the advertisements of iPhone X emphasize its wireless charging ability supported by the glass material it uses. Yet, in fact, the fragility of the glass and cost of fixing often trouble customers in daily life. Likewise, real-estate advertisers usually show that those who buy their houses will enjoy convenient transportations, big shopping malls and nearby schools, but they avoid telling us how the real traffic situation in the rush hour is, when the construction of malls can be finished or whether the schools are good enough. Therefore, with all these merits being displayed and shortcomings never being mentioned, products in advertisements seem much better than they really are in audience’s eyes.
Additionally, the endorsement from celebrities in the advertisement renders the products much better. Generally speaking, among multifarious advertisements, celebrity branding is widely adopted by companies, especially fashion or beauty brands. Those celebrity endorsers who can easily reach a wider audience will attract public attention, making customers believe that once they own the endorsed products they will also have pleasant using experience. The advertisement of Chanel No.5 perfume is a case in point. The supermodel endorser, Gisele Bundchen, is so charming and gorgeous that thousands of women who desire for charm pay for this perfume without a second thought even though this perfume might not be suitable or cost-effective. Hence, audience will naturally think the products are good not because they have good using experience but just because their idols or some famous people with positive images promote those products in advertisements.
In summary, given that advertisers tend to take advantage of celebrities’ influence and avoid all shortcomings of the products, they easily beautify their products.
【托福TPO17綜合寫(xiě)作范文及材料原文】相關(guān)文章：
托福TPO28綜合寫(xiě)作參考范文及原文材料03-26
托福綜合寫(xiě)作材料12-05