董事對第三人的法律義務(wù)

摘  要

隨著現(xiàn)代公司中董事會中心主義的確立，經(jīng)營管理權(quán)限的日益擴大，強化董事責(zé)任，能促使董事盡職盡責(zé)的履行其對公司的義務(wù)。我國公司法雖已規(guī)定了董事對公司的責(zé)任、義務(wù)，而且在學(xué)說上討論亦頗多。但董事對第3人的責(zé)任與義務(wù)，不僅在立法上處于空白，而且在法理上討論也不夠充分，這與第3人在公司法中的重要地位是不相對稱的。第3人雖然處于公司外部，但其與公司有著非常密切的關(guān)系，與公司的生存、發(fā)展利益攸關(guān)。相對于作為公司內(nèi)部人的董事來說，第3人對公司信息獲得的不對稱性，使得其權(quán)益加以特殊保護，以平衡公司、董事、第3人之間的利益。因此，強化董事對公司、第3人的責(zé)任、義務(wù)，對保護第3人的合法權(quán)益，維護交易安全，進而維護社會的經(jīng)濟秩序具有重要的意義。
 
關(guān)鍵詞：董事；第3人；法律義務(wù)

Abstract

 Along with the modern company in the board of directors center principle establishment, the management jurisdiction daily expansion, strengthens the director liability, can urge the director to fulfill obligation fulfills liability fulfills it to companys obligation. Our country company law although has stipulated the director to companys liability, the obligation, moreover discusses quite a lot also in the theory. But director to third-party of liability and obligation, not only is in the blank in the legislation, moreover discusses in the legal principle theory of law in sufficiently is also full, this and the third-party in the company law important status is not symmetrical. The third-party although is in outside the company, but it has extremely close relationship with the company, with companys survival, development benefit matter. Is opposite to said as the company interior persons director that, the third-party the dissymmetry which obtains to the company information, causes its rights and interests to perform specially to protect, by balances the company, the director, the third-party of between benefit. Therefore, strengthens the director to the company, the third-party of liability, the obligation, to protects the third-party of legitimate rights and interests, maintains the transaction security, then the main tenancy societys economic order has the vital significance.

Key word: director; third-party; legal obligation

..............................
注：【包括：畢業(yè)論文，任務(wù)書，開題報告】

【董事對第三人的法律義務(wù)】相關(guān)文章：

淺談醫(yī)患關(guān)系中患者的法律義務(wù)03-16

設(shè)立獨立董事基金 完善獨立董事制度03-21

論第三人成為探望權(quán)的主體03-20

董事的義務(wù)和責(zé)任03-25

論無獨立請求權(quán)第三人03-07

德國基本權(quán)第三人效力題目03-07

論民事訴訟中的第三人03-28

獨立董事引入后的沖突及其對董事會結(jié)構(gòu)的影響研究03-24

論對案外第三人權(quán)利救濟的途徑03-16